Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik dengan Menggunakan Metode Certainty of Respon Index (Cri) Materi Tata Surya Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v5i2.1853Kata Kunci:
Certainty of Response Index (CRI), Misconceptions, Solar System.Abstrak
The purpose of this study was to find out the misconceptions about the solar system material and the causes of the misconceptions about the solar system material for grade VI Elementary School. Sources of data used in the study were the results of diagnostic tests on solar system misconceptions, interviews with sixth grade students and teachers. The method of analysis includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that there were misconceptions that occurred in students of class VI solar system SDN Gayamsari 01 with a misconception category of 47.6%. Misconceptions often occur in the material of the solar system, namely the explanation of the solar system, the phases of the moon that students do not really understand and the direction of the earth's rotation is still wrong. The cause of the misconception that occurred in the first student, the way students learn is different because the current condition, namely the covid-19 pandemic, makes students have to study at home and make students learn only briefly. Second, low student motivation. Third, students' understanding of the material is reduced. Fourth, the teaching methods used by teachers are less varied.
Referensi
Amien. (1990). Manfaat Peta Konsep. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Eko Setyadi K, Arif. Komalasari. (2012). “Miskonsepsi Tentang Suhu Dan Kalor Pada Siswa Kelas 1 Di Sma Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Jawa Tengahâ€. Berkala Fisika Indonesia Volume 4 Nomor 1 & 2, 46-49.
Ensiklopedia IPA. (1998). Ensiklopedia IPA Visual Fisika, Kimia, Biologi, dan Matematika (Penerjemah: Anis Apriliawati, dkk). Jakarta: Lentera Abadi.
Hasan, S., D. Bagayoko, dan E. L. Kelley. (1999). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Teaching Physics. 34 (5): 294-300.
Laksana, Dek. Ngurah. (2016). Miskonsepsi Dalam Materi Ipa Sekolah Dasarâ€. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, Vol. 5, 166-175.
Maesyarah, A Wahab Jufri, Kusmiyati. (2015). “Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Dan Miskonsepsi Biologi Dengan Teknik Modifikasi Certainty Of Response Index Pada Siswa Smp Se-Kota Sumbawa Besarâ€. J. Pijar Mipa, Vol. X No.1, Maret 2015: 1-6, 1-6.
Permendiknas No. 23 Tentang Standar Kompetensi Kelulusan Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Ramalis, Winny. Liliawati. (2009). “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Ipba Di Sma Dengan Menggunakan Cri (Certainly Of Respons Index) Dalam Upaya Perbaikan Urutan Pemberian Materi Ipba Pada Ktspâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Penerapan Mipa (Pp. 159-168). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Mipa, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,.
Sugiono, P. D. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suparno, Paul. 2009. Miskonsepsi & Perubahan Konsep Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Sutrisno, Leo, Kresnadi, Dan Kartono. (2007). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD. Jakarta: PJJ S1 PGSD.
Sutrisno, L., Kresnadi, dan Kartono. (2008). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Yulianti, Y. (2017). Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Serta Remidiasinya. Jurnal Bio Education, 2, 50-58.
Yuliati, Lia. (2011). Miskonsepsi dan Remediasi pembelajaran IPA. (online). http://pjjpgsd.unesa.ac.id/dok/6.ModulMiskonsepsidanRemidiasiPembelajaranIPA.pdf
