Analisis Keterlaksanaan Komponen Program Kampus Mengajar di SD Inpres Kampus Unhas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v6i4.3331Kata Kunci:
Campus teaching, Literacy, Numeracy, Technology Adaptation, Student Interest in LearningAbstrak
This research aims to analyze the implementation of campus teaching program components at SD Inpres, Unhas Campus. The type of research used is a qualitative method because, in its actions, the researcher identifies the implementation of campus teaching program components, namely literacy, numeracy, and technology adaptation. The location of this research is SD Inpres, Unhas Campus. Data collection techniques in research include observation, interviews, and documentation. Based on the results of this research, several cases were found of students whose literacy and numeracy skills were still very poor; therefore, the author and the team held a class to help and guide these students until several meetings showed quite satisfactory progress in addition to their abilities. The adaptation of technology at the school is much more developed than before. The author and team helped the teaching staff at the school adapt more closely to technology. In this campus teaching program, students are appointed to take part in the program and have responsibilities in helping the school, such as assisting in teaching, adapting technology, and assisting school administration.
Referensi
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian. (Jakarta: Reineka Cipta. 2013). hlm.310
Ashari, Y. A., Setiawan, F., dan Mirnawati, L. 2022. Peran Mahasiswa dalam Membantu Adaptasi Teknologi Terhadap Guru pada Program Kampus Mengajar 1 di SD Pelita Bangsa Surabaya. Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar. Vol. 16, No. 1. ISSN 2548-9119.
Darwanto dan Mar’atun Khasanah. 2021. Pembelajaran Daring dengan Menggunakan Platform Edlink (Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19). Jurnal Eksponen. Volume 11. No.1. Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi.
Gerakan Literasi Nasional. 2017. Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. (Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017).
Muktar. 2013. Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. Jakarta: Referensi. hal. 101
Sevima. 2020. Pengertian Literasi Menurut Para Ahli, Tujuan, Manfaat, Jenis, dan Prinsip. http://sevima.com/pengertian-literasi-menurut-para-ahli-tujuan-manfaat-jenis-dan-prinsip/. (diakses pada tanggal 01 Agustus 2022)
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta. hal. 332
Suharwoto, Gogot. 2020. Pembelajaran Online di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19, Tantangan yang Mendewasakan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Retrieved from https://pusdatin.kemdikbud.go.id/pembelajaran-online-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19 tantanganyang-mendewasakan/.
Sujarweni, V. Wiratama. Metodologi Penelitian Lengkap, Prakti, dan Mudah Dipahami. (Yogyakarta; Pustaka Baru Press, 2014). hal. 34
Sukardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika hal. 81
Tohir, Mohammad. 2019. Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. https://matematohir.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/hasil-pisa-indonesia-tahun-2018-turun-dibanding-tahun-2015/.
Utami, L. D. 2021. Tingkat Literasi Indonesia di Dunia Rendah, Rangking 62 Dari 70 Negara. Website Perpustakaan Amir Machmud.https://perpustakaan.kemendagri.go.id/?p=4661