Muthmainnah Mursidin


This research was to find out: (1) the types of discourse markers used by the EFL students in comparison and contrast text and (2) the functions of discourse markers used by the EFL students in comparison and contrast text. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method. The respondents of this research was the second grade of EFL students; the total students was 30 students. The research data were collected by using an instrument namely writing activity. The writing consisted by comparison and contrast text.  The data were analyzed qualitatively. The first important finding from this research was about the types of DMs used by the students’ in three kinds of different text, there are 30 types of DMs used by the students in the comparison and compare text and the second important finding was there are four category of functions used by the students in writing activity, they were contrastive markers, inferential markers, elaborative markers, and additional subclasses markers. Despite the fact that DMs can create a smooth talk or make the conversation more natural, the students should be able to use DMs wisely in term of fluency and coherence measured in the students’ writing.


Discourse Markers (DMs); Students’ English Writing; Comparison and contrast text

Full Text:



Aidinlou, N. A, and Mehr. H. S. 2012. The Effect of Discourse Markers Instruction on EFL Learners’ Writing. Iran: Department of English Language and Linguistics, Islamic Azad University.

Aijmer, K. 2002. English discourse particles. Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Degand, L. 2010. On Describing Polysemous Discourse Markers. What does translation add to the picture? University Catholique de Louvain. [Online] Available: http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ud/doc/vailbel/documents/Degand-polysemy-proofread.pdf.

Fraser, Bruce. 2002. An Approach to Discourse Markers. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 14, Issue 3. [Online] Available: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/0378-2166 (90)90096-V.

. 1990. “An approach to discourse markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383-395.

. 1998. Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. In: Jucker & Ziv(eds): Discourse Markers [C]. John Benjamin’s Publishing Company, 1998:301-326.

Gay, LR. 2006. Educational Research; Competencies for Analysis and Application. USA: Charles E. Merril Publishing.

Gerard, S. 2000. Discourse Markers. Centre for Applied Linguistics. Learning English online at Warwick.

Halliday, M. A. K. 2000. Introduction to Functional Grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Beijing.

Halliday, M.A. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D., et al. 2002. The handbook of discourse analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.

How To Cite

Add References

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v2i2.473

Article metrics

Abstract views : 142 | views : 52


Dipublikasikan Oleh

Program Studi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar

STKIP Andi Matappa Pangkep

Alamat: Jalan Andi Mauraga No 70 Kabupaten Pangkep-Sulsel

Cp. 08114627656 dan Email: [email protected]


DIKDAS MATAPPA telah terindex oleh:




Dedicated to:



  Creative Commons License

DIKDAS MATAPPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.