Penyusunan Skala Learning Agility Dengan Aiken’s V Dan Uji Reliabilitas

Authors

  • Ayu Meryka Santoso Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Herlina Siwi Widiana Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v6i1.1699

Keywords:

Aiken's V, Learning Agility, Reliability, Scale

Abstract

Learning agility perlu dimiliki oleh siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) agar setelah lulus para siswa dapat menjawab tantangan dunia kerja yang terus meningkat dari waktu ke waktu. Penelitian ini merupakan bagian dari penelitian pengembangan alat ukur learning agility pada siswa SMK di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji validitas isi dan reliabilitas skala learning agility berdasarkan kondisi siswa SMK di Indonesia. Pengujian validitas isi melalui rating oleh lima rater, dengan tiga tahap, yaitu review terhadap 32 aitem, revisi aitem, dan penilaian kembali oleh rater. Koefisien validitas isi diperoleh melalui perhitungan CVI dari formula Aiken’s V. Aitem-aitem skala yang telah dinyatakan valid diujicobakan, selanjutnya dilakukan pemilihan aitem berdasar daya diskriminasi aitem dan pengujian reliabilitas skala dengan koefsien alpha Cronbach. Hasil analisis diperoleh 24 aitem skala learning agility dengan CVI bergerak dari 0.8 sampai 1 dengan validitas skala sebesar 0.903 dan corrected item-total correlation bergerak dari 0.385 sampai 0.724 dengan koefisien reliabilitas alpha Cronbach sebesar 0.927.

Author Biographies

Ayu Meryka Santoso, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Herlina Siwi Widiana, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

References

AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (4th ed.). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012.

Azwar, S. (2019). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Burke, W. (2018). Technical report: Burke learning agility inventoryTM v3.3. EASI Consult. https://easiconsult.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/burke-learning-agility-inventory-technical-report.pdf.

De Meuse, K. P. (2017). Learning agility: Its Evolution as a psychological consturct and its empirical relationship to leader success. Consulting Psychology Journal, 69(4), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000100.

De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., Eichinger, R. W., Page, R. C., Clark, L. P., & Zewdie, S. (2011). The development and validation of a self assessment of learning agility. In Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Chicago, Illinois. Lominger. https://doi.org/http://larryclarckgroup.com.

DeMeuse, K. P., & Feng, S. (2015). The development and validation of the TALENTx7 Assessment: A psychological measure of learning agility. https://doi.org/https://10.13140/RG.2.1.4905.7769.

Gravett, L. S., & Caldwell, S. (2016). The Impact on Recruitment and retention. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59965-0

Hariyanto, V. L., Usman, H., & Pardjono. (2017). The implementation of integrated learning for developing the entrepreneurship readiness for the students of vocational high school majoring in architecture engineering. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(2), 228–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i2.14842.

Hermawan, D., Aisyah, S., & Khoirunnissa, K. (2019). Analisis literasi teknologi guru bimbingan dan konseling se-DKI Jakarta menghadapi era industri 4.0. JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, 3(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v3i2.367

Howard, D. (2017). Learning agility in education: An analysis of pre-service teacher’s learning agility and teaching performance. Tarleton State University. https://doi.org/https://www.proquest.com/openview/f816c8411bbc7a4a968a582e5b7cda2a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Jayanti, I. S. (2018). Adaptasi instrumen career decision-making difficulties questionnaire (CDDQ) pada mahasiswa di Indonesia (Tesis). Universitas Padjadjaran. https://pustaka.unpad.ac.id/archives/169413

Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. D. (2018). The relationships of family, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility in sustainable student engagement in higher education. Sustainability, 10(12), 4365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124635.

Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321–329.

Pratama, E. B. A., Purwono, U., & Yudiana, W. (2021). Validasi isi alat ukur kesiapan keputusan karier. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 10(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian: Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian. Parama Publishing. Parama Publishing. https://doi.org/http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/pendidikan/heri-retnawati-dr/analisis-instrumen-penelitiana4100hal.pdf.

Rezasyah, T., Darmawan, I., & Rifawan, A. (2018). Kesiapan siswa SMK dalam revolusi industry 4.0. (Studi pada SMK Global Mulia Cikarang). Kumawula, 1(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/http://10.24198/kumawula.v1i2.20029.

Santoso, A. M., & Yuzarion. (2021). Analysis of learning agility in the performance of achievement teachers in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pedagogik, 08(01), 77–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v8i1.2126

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. https://doi.org/https://www.pdfdrive.com/prof-dr-sugiyono-metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-intro-e56379944.html.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

Issue

Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright of any open access articles in journals published by JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa authorized author to hold unrestricted copyright

The author also grants the third party the right to use the article freely provided that its integrity is maintained and its original author, details of quotations and publishers are identified. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. formalizes the terms and conditions of this publication and these terms.

In addition to Jurkam's copyright policy: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, some journals also follow the Open Accses policy and endorsement of the Public Domain Dedication Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Creative Commons License applies to all data published in this journal.

If a writer is prevented from becoming a copyright holder (eg for government employees), little variation is required. In such cases, copyright lines and license statements in individual articles will be adjusted, for example to say '© 2017 copyright'. Authors who require this type of variation should notify Jurkam during or immediately after the submission of their article. Changes to the copyright line can not be made after the publication of the article.


Exceptions to copyright policy There may be exceptions to copyright and permissions for previously published articles under different policies from the above. For example, sometimes Jurkam: Jurnak Konseling Andi Matappa may publish articles together with other publishers, and different permission conditions may apply. However, in all cases, access to this article is free of cost or other access restrictions.

 

Creative Commons License
JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.