Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V yang Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent dengan Independent

Authors

  • Rahman Rahman Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Makmur Nurdin Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Rosmalah Rosmalah Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v4i4.1374

Keywords:

Cognitive Style, Learning Outcomes, Mathematics.

Abstract

This study is a quantitative study with comparative model that aims to determine whether or not there is a difference between the mathematics learning outcomes of five (5th) grade students of SD cluster I Salomekko district, Bone regency which field dependent and independent cognitive style. The data in this study were collected by GEFT test and learning outcomes tests and processed using descriptive statistical analysis and inferential analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the mathematics learning outcomes of  five (5th) grade students of SD cluster I Salomekko district, Bone regency which field dependent and independent cognitive style with tcount (-4,37) is smaller (<) the value of     -ttable (-1.988) which means H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that there is a difference between the mathematics learning outcomes of fifth grade elementary school students in Cluster I, Salomekko district, Bone regency with field dependent cognitive style and field independent cognitive style. Thus, it can be said that each student has different abilities or cognitive styles. Therefore, the learning outcomes obtained are alsodifferent due to differences in cognitive styles.

Author Biographies

Rahman Rahman, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Mahasiswa PGSD, FIP, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Makmur Nurdin, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Dosen PGSD, FIP, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Rosmalah Rosmalah, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Dosen PGSD, FIP, Universitas Negeri Makassar

References

Arikunto S. & Cepi. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta

Husamah, Yuni Pantiwati, Arina Restian, P. S. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran (Malang). UMM.

Mailili, W. H. (2018). Deskripsi Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 1(1), 1–7.

Ngilawajan, D. A. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA Dalam Field Independent dan Field Dependent. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2(1), 71–83.

Ningsih, P. S. (2017). Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Berdasarkan Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VIII MTs AL-HIKMAH Bandar. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Patta, R., Jafar, M. I., & Syamsuddin, S. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Mahasiswa PGSD. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 3(3). 1-10.

Riduwan. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Beriorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Susanto, H. A. (2015). Pemahaman Pemecahan Masalah Berdasar Gaya Kognitif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Syamsuddin S., Makmur, Nurdin., Kadir, A. (2018). Deskripsi Tingkat Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri Kecamatan Tanete Riattang. JIKAP PGSD : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 2(2).

UU RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Yusuf, M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penlitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Yuyun Yukentin, Mumun Munawaroh, W. W. (2018). Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Kepribadian Ekstrovert Dan Introvert. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 3(2), 163–168.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check