Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Terbalik (Reciprocal Teaching) Terhadap Motivasi Belajar IPA Murid Kelas V SDN 43 Parasangan Beru Kabupaten Maros

Authors

  • Khaerun Nisa’a Tayibu STKIP Andi Matappa, Indonesia
  • Habibi Musa STKIP Andi Matappa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v3i2.830

Keywords:

effectiveness, reverse learning, science learning motivation.

Abstract

Thus, this study aims to determine the effectiveness of implementing reverse learning (reciprocal teaching) on the science motivation of fifth grade students of SD. This type of research is experimental (true-experimental design). The population in this study were 62 students of Class V SDN 43 Parasangan Beru,. The sample of the study was 58 students where the experimental group was 29 students and the control group was 29 students who were taken using non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling method. The instruments used consisted of teacher and student observation sheets and a science learning motivation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, namely the t test. The results showed that: (i) Implementation of learning using reverse learning (reciprocal teaching) has increased in each meeting, both in terms of learning implementation, student learning activities and student learning motivation. (ii) There are differences in science learning outcomes between before and after being taught using reverse learning (reciprocal teaching), (iii) The use of reverse learning (reciprocal teaching) is effective in increasing science learning motivation for fifth grade.

Author Biographies

Khaerun Nisa’a Tayibu, STKIP Andi Matappa

Dosen PGSD STKIP Andi Matappa

Habibi Musa, STKIP Andi Matappa

Dosen PGSD STKIP Andi Matappa

References

Abugaza, A. 2013. Social Media Politica: Gerak Massa Tanpa Lembaga. Jakarta: PT. Tali Writing & Publishing House

Chaplin, J.P. 2011. Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Diterjemahkan oleh Kartini Kartono. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hadianto, W. 2008. Berfikir Efektif di Perguruan Tinggi. (Online). (http://www.uin-suka.info, diakases 13 Februari 2019).

Hartono & Boy, S. 2012. Psikologi Konseling. Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Maulana, H. & Gumgum, G. 2013. Psikologi Komunikaasi dan Persuasi. Jakarta: Akademia Permata.

Mcleod, J. 2006. Pengantar Konseling: Teori dan Studi Kasus. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mulyana, I. 2008. Perbedaan Problem Solving dengan Decision Making. (Online). (http://www.e-iman.uni.cc, diakses 20 Maret 2019)

Nurdin, S. 2015. Langkah-Langkah Pembelajaran Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving, CPS Dan Problem Base Learning. (Online). (https://www.academia.edu/, diakses 20 Maret 2019)

Prayitno. 1998. Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling: Sekolah Menengah Umum (SMU). Jakarta: Kerjasama Koperasi Karyawan Pusgrafin dengan penerbit Panebar Aksara.

Romlah, T. 2013. Teori dan Praktek Bimbingan Kelompok. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Soliha, S.F. 2015. Tingkat Ketergantungan Pengguna Media Sosial Dan Kecemasan Sosial, (Online); Jurnal Interaksi Vol. 4 No. 1. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi/. (diakses 9 februari 2019)

Yusuf, S. 2006. Program Bimbingan dan Konseling Di Sekolah (SLTP Dan SLTA). Bandung: Bani Quraisy.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-26

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check