Peran Resolusi Konflik Dan Ekspresivitas Emosi Terhadap Kepuasan Pernikahan Pada Masa Awal Pernikahan

Authors

  • Ni Kadek Ayu Diah Aryasvini Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Jenny Lukito Setiawan Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v6i2.2020

Keywords:

Kepuasan Pernikahan, Resolusi Konflik, Ekspresivitas Emosi, Masa Awal Menikah, Kolektivistik.

Abstract

Masa awal menikah sangat identik dengan permasalahan adaptasi yang perlu dihadapi oleh pasangan. Salah satu faktor yang juga berkontribusi pada pernikahan di Indonesia adalah adanya kultur kolektivistik. Kepuasan pernikahan menjadi tolak ukur dalam menentukan seberapa berhasilnya pasangan melakukan adaptasi dalam hubungan mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari resolusi konflik dan ekspresivitas emosi terhadap kepuasan pernikahan pada pasangan masa awal menikah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif desain korelasional dengan partisipan berjumlah 102 orang dengan usia pernikahan 3-5 tahun sebagai subjek penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa resolusi konflik memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kepuasan pernikahan (p= 0.018; F= 5.672) dengan kontribusi sebesar 5.4% (R2= 0.054), sedangkan variabel ekspresivitas emosi tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap kepuasan pernikahan pada masa awal menikah (p> 0.05).

References

Anjani, C., & Suryanto. (2006). Pola penyesuaian perkawinan pada periode awal. INSAN, 8(3), 198-210.

Azwar, S. (2017). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Bahr, S. J., Chappell, C. B., & Leigh, G. K. (1983). Age at marriage, role enactment, role consensus, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(4), 795-803. https://doi.org/10.2307/351792

Dyer, W. G. (1962). Analyzing marital adjustment using role theory. Marriage and Family Living, 24(4), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.2307/349110

Emerson, R. W. (2021). Convenience sampling revisited: Embracing its limitations through thoughtful study design. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 115(1), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X20987707

Esmaeeli, M., Jofreh, M. G., & Shafiabady, A. (2016). What keeps dissatisfied people in marriage?. Asian Social Science, 12(4), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n4p188

Era Indonesia Digital. (2018, 18 September). Fakta di balik tingginya angka perceraian di Indonesia. Era Indonesia Digital. Diakses pada 6 Maret 2021 di era.id/afair/12369/fakta-di-balik-tingginya-angka-perceraian-di-indonesia.

Hall, S. S., & Adams, R. (2011). Newlyweds’ unexpected adjustments to marriage. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 39(4), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02076.x

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ibrahim, A., Alang, A. H., Madi, Baharuddin, & Ahmad, M. A. D. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian (I. Ismail, Ed.). Gunadarma Ilmu.

Jalovaara, M., & Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch?. European Sociological Review, 34(5), 486-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy017

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635

Kendrick, H. M., & Drentea, P. (2016). Marital adjustment. Encyclopedia of Family Studies, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs071

Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472-503.

King, L. A. (1993). Emotional expression, ambivalence over expression, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(4), 601-607.

Kluwer, E. S. (2010). From partnership to parenthood: A review of marital change across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00045.x

Kring, A. M., Smith, D. A., & Neale, J. M. (1994). Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: Development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 934-949. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.934

Kulu, H. (2014). Marriage duration and divorce: The seven-year itch or a lifelong itch?. Demography, 51(3), 881-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0278-1

Lavee, Y., & Ben-Ari, A. (2004). Emotional expressiveness and neuroticism: Do they predict marital quality?. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.620

Lorber, M. F., Erlanger, A. C. E., Heyman, R. E., & O’Leary, K. D. (2015). The Honeymoon Effect: Does It Exist and Can It Be Predicted?. Prevention Science, 16(4), 550-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0480-4

Meliani, F., Sunarti, E., & Krisnatuti, D. (2014). Faktor demografi, konflik kerja-keluarga, dan kepuasan perkawinan istri bekerja. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 7(3), 133-142.

Muhid, A., Nurmamita, P. E., & Hanim, L. M. (2019). Resolusi konflik dan kepuasan pernikahan: Analisis perbandingan berdasarkan aspek demografi. Mediapsi, 5(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2019.005.01.5

Nadia, Janah, N., & Bustamam, N. (2017). Hubungan resolusi konflik pasangan suami istri bekerja dengan kepuasan pernikahan pada usia pernikahan 3-5 tahun. Jurnal SULOH, 2(2), 22-31.

Nurdini, A. (2006). “Cross-sectional vs longitudinalâ€: Pilihan rancangan waktu dalam penelitian perumahan permukiman. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 34(1), 52–58. http://www.petra.ac.id/~puslit/journals/dir.php?DepartmentID=ARS

Olson, D. H., Larson, P. J., & Olson, A. K. (2009). PREPARE/ENRICH program: Customized version. Minneapolis: Minnesota Life Innovation.

Olson, D. H., Olson-Sigg, A., & Larson, P. J. (2008). The couple checkup: Find your relationship strengths. Minneapolis: Thomas Nelson, Inc.

Paramita, N. K. P., & Suarya, L. M. K. S. (2018). Peran komunikasi interpersonal dan ekspresi emosi terhadap kepuasan perkawinan pada perempuan di usia dewasa madya. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 5(2), 241-253.

Renanita, T., & Setiawan, J. L. (2018). Marital satisfaction in terms of communication, conflict resolution, sexual intimacy, and financial relations among working and non-working wives. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 22(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.2050418

Sanford, K. (2007). Hard and soft emotion during conflict: Investigating married couples and other relationships. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 65-90.

Schumm’, W. R., Nichols, C. W., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas marital. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 567-572.

Skurtu, A. (2016). Pre-marital counseling: A guide for clinicians. New York: Routledge.

Tavakol, Z., Nasrabadi, A. N., Behboodi, Z., 1, M., Salehiniya, H., Rezaei, E., & Moghadam, Z. B. (2017). A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. GMJ, 6(3), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.22086/gmj.v0i0.641

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323

Yedirir, S., & Hamarta, E. (2015). Emotional expression and spousal support as predictors of marital satisfaction: The case of Turkey. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(6), 1549-1558. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.2822

Zainah, A. Z., Nasir, R., Hashim, R. S., & Md Yusof, N. (2012). Effects of demographic variables on marital satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 8(9), 46-49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n9p46

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-08-31

Issue

Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright of any open access articles in journals published by JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa authorized author to hold unrestricted copyright

The author also grants the third party the right to use the article freely provided that its integrity is maintained and its original author, details of quotations and publishers are identified. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. formalizes the terms and conditions of this publication and these terms.

In addition to Jurkam's copyright policy: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, some journals also follow the Open Accses policy and endorsement of the Public Domain Dedication Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Creative Commons License applies to all data published in this journal.

If a writer is prevented from becoming a copyright holder (eg for government employees), little variation is required. In such cases, copyright lines and license statements in individual articles will be adjusted, for example to say '© 2017 copyright'. Authors who require this type of variation should notify Jurkam during or immediately after the submission of their article. Changes to the copyright line can not be made after the publication of the article.


Exceptions to copyright policy There may be exceptions to copyright and permissions for previously published articles under different policies from the above. For example, sometimes Jurkam: Jurnak Konseling Andi Matappa may publish articles together with other publishers, and different permission conditions may apply. However, in all cases, access to this article is free of cost or other access restrictions.

 

Creative Commons License
JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.