Kegiatan Diskursus Sosial Mengenai Model Matematika Tindakan Radikalisme, Terorisme, dan Fanatisme

Mohamad Rif'at; Sugiatno Sugiatno; Ahmad Yani; Dona Fitrawan; Nurfadilah Siregar

doi:10.31100/matappa.v5i2.1614

Authors

Mohamad Rif'at
Sugiatno Sugiatno
Ahmad Yani
Dona Fitrawan
Nurfadilah Siregar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/matappa.v5i2.1614

Keywords:

Diskursus, Fanatisme, Model Matematika Radikalisme, Terorisme,

Abstract

Tujuan kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (PKM) adalah membangun diskursus mengenai pemodelan matematika sebagai pendekatan untuk memahami dan membuat keputusan tentang fenomena radikalisme, terorisme, dan fanatisme. Pendekatan ini digunakan untuk mendorong para pihak (khalayak sasaran) agar dapat menyorot kepentingan dan relevansi matematika dalam menjawab berbagai persoalan terkait. Pendekatan ini juga membantu dalam transfer keterampilan, termasuk kebiasaan berpikir yang menyebar ke dalam berbagai disiplin ilmu. Perlu diperhatikan bahwa model matematika pada prinsipnya dapat diterapkan juga pada skenario kriminal dan teroris dalam populasi yang homogen seperti yang terjadi dalam kasus di beberapa negara Tim PKM FKIP UNTAN mengajak khalayak sasaran untuk secara bersama-sama mengenal pemodelan matematika sekaligus sebagai suatu bentuk laporan akuntabilitas untuk memasukkannya kepada stakeholder.

References

Ahmed A.G., Audu D. Loza W. Maximenco A. (2013). The prevalence of extreme Middle-Eastern ideologies among some Nigerians. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 1 161â€“167.

Ashour O. (2010). Online de-radicalization? Countering violent extremist narratives: Message, messenger and media dtrategy. Perspectives on Terrorism, 4 15â€“19.

Bakker, E. (2006). Jihadi terrorists in Europe, their characteristics and the circumstances in which they joined the Jihad: An exploratory study, Technology reports. Den Haag, The Netherlands: The Hague Clingendael Institute.

Bouhana N., WikstrÂ¨om P. O. (2011). Al Qaâ€™ida-inï¬‚uenced radicalization: A rapid evidence assessment guided. Situational Action Theory Home Ofï¬ce, Occasional Paper, 97 1â€“113.

Brown, P. L. (2002). Ideas and Trends: Blinded by Science. The New York Times, July 14, 2002, p. 3.

Cherney A. (2018). Evaluating interventions to disengage extremist offenders: a study of the proactive integrated support model (PRISM). Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression DOI: 10.1080/19434472.2018.1495661.

Cooney M., Bigman N. (2015). Terrorism as gravitational attraction in Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Terrorism and Counterterrorism Today edited by Deï¬‚em M., EmeraldGroup Publishing Limited, Vol. 5 Bingley, UK.

De Coensela S. (2018). Processual models of radicalization into terrorism: A best ï¬t framework synthesis. Journal for De-radicalization, 17 89â€“127.

Dyer C., McCoy R.E., Rodriguez J., Van Duyn D.N. (2007). Countering violent Islamic extremism: A community responsibility. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 76 3â€“9.

Ganor B., Von Knop K. (2007). Hypermedia seduction for terrorist recruiting. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series E: Human and Societal Dynamics 25 IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Gill, P. (2015). Lone actor terrorists: A behavioral analysis. Routledge, London, UK.

Holbrook D., Taylor M. (2017). Terrorism as process narratives: A study of pre-arrest media usage and the emergence of pathways to engagement. Terrorism and Political Violence, DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1341879.

Horgan, J. (2008). From proï¬les to pathways and roots to routes: Perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism. The Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Sciences, 618 80â€“94.

Jasko K., LaFree G., Kruglanski A. (2017). Quest for signiï¬cance and violent extremism: The case of domestic radicalization. Political Psychology, 38 815â€“831.

Kaplan J. (2016). Waves of political terrorism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford University Press.

Klausen J., Libretti R., Hung B., Jayasumana A.P. (2018). Radicalization trajectories: An evidencebased computational approach to dynamic risk assessment of homegrown jihadists. Studies in Conï¬‚ict & Terrorism, https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1492819.

Loza, W., Abd-el-Fatah, Y., Prinsloo, J., Hesselink-Louw, A., and Seidler, K. (2011). The prevalence of extreme Middle Eastern ideologies around the world. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26 522â€“38.

McCauley C., Moskalenko S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20 415â€“433.

Rapoport, D.C. (2002). The four waves of rebel terror and September 11. Anthropoetics, The Journal of Generative Anthropology, 8 1â€“19.

Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding Terrorist Networks. University of Philadelphia University Press Philadelphia, PA.

Scarcella, A., Page, R., and Furtado, V. (2016). Terrorism, radicalisation, extremism, authoritarianism and fundamentalism: A systematic review of the quality and psychometric properties of assessments. PLoS One, 11 e0166947.

Schlesinger A.M. (1986). The cycles of American history. Houghton Mifï¬‚in, Boston.

Schuurman, B. and Eijkman, Q. (2015). Indicators of terrorist intent and capability: Tools for threat assessment. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conï¬‚ict, 8 215â€“231.

Silber, M.D. and Bhatt, A. (2007). Radicalization in the West: The homegrown threat. NYPD Intelligence Division.

Silke A. (2003). Becoming a terrorist, in Terrorists, victims and society: Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences. Ddited by Silke A., Wiley, Philadelphia, PA.

Silke A. (2008). Holy warriors, Exploring the psychological process of Jihadi radicalization. European Journal of Criminology, 5 99â€“123.

Victoroff J. (2006). Tangled roots: Social and psychological factors in the genesis of terrorism. NATO Security through science series: Human and societal dynamics 11.

Wright-Neville D. (2006). Terrorism as the policy of dashed expectations. Academy of the Social Sciences, 25 11â€“23.