HUBUNGAN METODE TUTOR SEBAYA DAN PENIDIKAN KARAKTER DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMPN 1 KOTA PANGKAJENE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v8i1.3478Keywords:
pemahaman konsep, logaritma, self-efficacyAbstract
Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis kuantitafif dengan metode survey dan teknik korelasional. Metode yang digunakan untuk menggambarkan hubungan antar variabel yang diteliti dan hubungan antar variabel yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai koefisien korelasi. Koefisien korelasi merupakan suatu alat statistik yang digunakan untuk membantu peneliti dalam memahami tingkat hubungan tersebut. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu untuk mengetahui hubungan antara metode tutor sebaya dan pendidikan karakter secara bersama-sama dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa. Dari hasil penelitian dan pengolahan data yang dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan antara metode tutor sebaya dan pendidikan karakter secara bersama-sama dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Kota Pangkajene. Pendidikan karakter dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu alternatif dalam pembentukan karakter dalam kehidupan sehari-hari.
Kata Kunci: Metode Tutor Sebaya, Pendidikan Karakter, Hasil Belajar Matematika
References
Best, M., & Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2017). The function concept at the transition to upper secondary school level: tasks for a situation of change. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0880-6
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting Proof-Related Tasks in Middle School Mathematics: Challenges and Opportunities Enacting Proof-Related Tasks in Challenges and Opportunities. Source: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/41103880
Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. a, & Whitacre, I. (2014). Obstacles and Affordances for Integer Reasoning?: An Analysis of Children ’ s Thinking and the History of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 19–61. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0019
Csíkos, C., & Szitányi, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching word problem solving strategies. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01115-y
Ebony O. McGee. (2015). Robust and Fragile Mathematical Identities: A Framework for Exploring Racialized Experiences and High Achievement Among Black College Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 599. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0599
Ekowati, D. W., Azzahra, F. Z., Saputra, S. Y., & Suwandayani, B. I. (2021). Realistic mathematics education (RME) approach for primary school students’ reasoning ability. Premiere Educandum?: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i2.8397
Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. C. (2009). Visual and Analytic Thinking in Calculus. Mathematics Teacher, 103(2), 140–145. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=44027894&site=ehost-live
Hoogland, K., & Tout, D. (2018). Computer-based assessment of mathematics into the twenty-first century: pressures and tensions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(4), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0944-2
Jojo, Z. M. M., Maharaj, A., & Brijlall, D. (2013). From Human Activity to Conceptual Understanding of the Chain Rule. Journal of Research InMathematics Education, 2(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2013.21
Jones, S. R. (2018). Prototype images in mathematics education: the case of the graphical representation of the definite integral. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9794-z
Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of Children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096
Lee, K. H. (2017). Convergent and divergent thinking in task modification: a case of Korean prospective mathematics teachers’ exploration. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(7), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0889-x
Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(7), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy for Preservice Elementary Teachers in Science Content Courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Muyassaroh, I., & Dewi, P. (2021). Etnomatematika: Strategi Melahirkan Generasi Literat Matematika Melalui Budaya Lokal Yogyakarta. Jurnal Dikoda, 2(1), 1–12.
Ndlovu, M., Ramdhany, V., Spangenberg, E. D., & Govender, R. (2020). Preservice teachers’ beliefs and intentions about integrating mathematics teaching and learning ICTs in their classrooms. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01186-2
Nolte, M., & Pamperien, K. (2017). Challenging problems in a regular classroom setting and in a special foster programme. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0825-5
Ratnayake, I., Thomas, M., & Kensington-Miller, B. (2020). Professional development for digital technology task design by secondary mathematics teachers. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01180-8
Renninger, K. A., Cai, M., Lewis, M. C., Adams, M. M., & Ernst, K. L. (2011). Motivation and learning in an online, unmoderated, mathematics workshop for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9195-4
Scheiner, T. (2016). New light on old horizon: Constructing mathematical concepts, underlying abstraction processes, and sense making strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9665-4
Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
Verzosa, D. M. B. (2020). Pre-service elementary teachers’ reasoning in introducing multidigit subtraction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1647573
Williams, K., & Williams, H. (2021). Mathematics problem-solving homework as a conduit for parental involvement in learning. Evaluation of a pilot study. Educational Review, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566210
Yi?it Koyunkaya, M. (2016). Mathematics education graduate students’ understanding of trigonometric ratios. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(7), 1028–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1155774
Yu, R., & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1204260
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rahmat Kamaruddin, Ahmad Budi Sutrisno, Hastuty Musa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. By submitting the article/manuscript, the author(s) accept this policy.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by a stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika's spirit is to disseminate articles published for free. Under the Creative Commons license, Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika when distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in one's future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for one's purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika).
5. Co-Authorship
If other authors jointly prepared the article, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have authorized them to agree on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agree to inform their co-authors of the terms of this policy. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will not be held liable for anything arising from the author(s) internal dispute. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such an extent that it is legally permissible, the author waives their right to collect royalties relative to the article regarding any use by Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
7. Miscellaneous
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the editorial process is completed. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika h editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published to be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers, as mentioned in point 3.
