KEEFEKTIFAN INSTRUMEN TES HASIL BELAJAR BERDASARKAN KOMPONEN PROSES LITERASI MATEMATIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v6i2.2379Keywords:
keefektifan, pengembangan instrumen, literasi matematikaAbstract
Penelitian ini merupakan kelanjutan dari penelitian sebelumnya, dimana sebelumnya telah dikembangkan instrument tes hasil belajar berdasarkan standar proses literasi matematika. Dari hasil pengembangan instrument yang telah dilakukan, dihasilkan bahwa instrument yang dikembangkan dikatakan layak untuk digunakan dengan indikator kelayakan ditinjau dari segi kevalidan dan kepraktisan. Dari segi kevalidan, telah dinyatakan valid oleh tiga validator ahli, sedangkan dari segi kepraktisan telah dikatakan praktis dari hasil angket respon mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengetahui sejauh mana keefektifan instrumen tes hasil belajar yang telah dikembangkan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen, dengan mengambil satu kelas eksperimen dan satu kelas kontrol dengan masing-masing sampel sebanyak 20 mahasiswa. Dari hasil eksperimen, diperoh hasil bahwa:(1) nilai tes dari instrumen yang telah dikembangkan diperoleh nilai signifikansi hasil uji saphiro-wilk sebesar 0,16 dengan demikian H0 diterima yang menunjukkan data normal; (2) pada uji levene test diperoleh nilai signifikansi 0,337 yang berarti H0 diterima maka data homogen; (3) hasil uji independent sample t-test diperoleh nilai signifikansi 0,001maka H0 ditolak sehingga terdapat perbedaan rata-rata yang sangat signifikan antara kelas kelas eksperimen dan kontrol. Dari ketiga hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengembangan instrumen tes berdasarkan standar proses literasi efektif.
References
Ojose, B. (2011). “Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able To Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everiday Use?â€. Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 No.1 Hal. 89-100.
Draper, R. J. (2002). “School Mathematics Reform, Constructivism, and Literacy: A Case for Literacy Instruction in The Reform-Oriented Math Classroomâ€. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 46 No. 6.
Wong, Patrick. (2005). “Mathematical Literacy of Hong Kong’s 15 Year Old Students in PISAâ€. Education Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1.
Stacey, Kaye. (2010). “Mathematical and Scientific Literacy Around The Worldâ€. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, Vol. 33 No. 1 Hal. 1-16.
Brewley, D. S. (2012). “College Mathematics Literacy Workers of The Young People’s Project Chicago: A Community of Practiceâ€. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, Vol. 5 No. 1 Hal. 44-54.
BSNP. (2007). Standar Proses Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: BSNP.
Rusmining. (2020). “Analisis Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Komponen Proses Literasi Matematikaâ€. Jurnal Histogram Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 4, No. 2.
Rusmining. (2017). “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Ditinjau Dari Komponen Prosesâ€. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 6, No. 3.
OECD. (2019). Multilingual Summaries PISA 2018 Results (Volume 1) What Students Know and Can Do. Summary in Indonesian.
OECD. (2010). The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/15/46241909.pdf (diunduh 5 Oktober 2013).
Rusmining. (2018). “Analysis of content components and context components of mathematics literacy on linear algebraâ€. IOP Conference Series.
Rusmining. (2019). “Penerapan Think Pair Share Bermuatan Literasi Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematikaâ€. Jurnal Histogram Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 3, No. 2.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Heriyadi, H., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2020). “Pengembangan lembar kegiatan siswa menggunakan pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistikâ€. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 395-412.
Hasanah, U., Wardono, W., & Kartono, K. (2016). KEEFEKTIFAN PEMBELAJARAN MURDER BERPENDEKATAN PMRI DENGAN ASESMEN KINERJA PADA PENCAPAIAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP SERUPA PISA. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2).
Pandra, V., & Mardapi, D. (2017). “Development of Mathematics Achievement Test for Third Grade Students at Elementary School in Indonesiaâ€. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(8), 769–776.
Savitri, S.N., Rochmad, & Agoestanto, A. (2013). “Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika Mengacu pada Missouri Mathematics Project Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalahâ€. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1).
Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). “Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach: Its application and development through the use of a Table of spesifications methodolyâ€. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Â
Please find the rights and licenses in Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) accept this policy.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.Â
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by a stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
7. Miscellaneous
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika h editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
