AKTIVITAS PENALARAN KONTROVERSIAL MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH ALJABAR

Authors

  • Sikky El Walida Universitas Islam Malang
  • Fadhila Kartika Sari Universitas Islam Malang
  • Yuli Ismi Nahdiyati Ilmi Universitas Islam Malang
  • Gusti Firda Khairunnisa Universitas Islam Malang

Keywords:

aktivitas penalaran kontroversial, masalah kontroversial matematis, aljabar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi aktivitas penalaran kontroversial mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontroversial matematis yang terdapat pada materi persamaan aljabar. Penelitian deskriptif ini dilakukan terhadap 76 mahasiswa semester 6 program studi Pendidikan Matematika salah satu universitas swasta di Malang. Data penalaran kontroversial diperoleh dari hasil pekerjaan mahasiswa menggunakan instrumen tes dan wawancara. Analisis data dan interpretasi makna temuan diperoleh melalui analisis teks data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penalaran kontroversial mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontroversial matematis pada persamaan aljabar memiliki aktivitas eksplorasi, kontradiksi, refleksi, dan klarifikasi. Pada aktivitas eksplorasi, subjek mengenali komponen-komponen masalah. Pada aktivitas kontradiksi, subjek menemukan komponen yang menyebabkan pertentangan. Pada aktivitas refleksi subjek menelusuri kembali penyebab pertentangan, dan akhirnya subjek mengklarifikasi untuk menemukan solusi. Dengan demikian, dosen pengampu dan mahasiswa dapat mengembangkan model pembelajaran yang melibatkan aktivitas penalaran kontroversial untuk keberhasilan pembelajaran selanjutnya.

References

Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273

Didi?, M. G., Ba?, S., & Erba?, A. K. (2011). Students’ reasoning in quadratic equations with one unknown. The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04000.x

El Walida, S., Cholis, S., Subanji, & Sisworo. (2022). A portrait of controversial mathematics problems and students’ metacognitive awareness: A case of Indonesia. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(12), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i12

Gurat, M. . (2018). Mathematical problem-solving strategies among student teachers. ERIES Journal, 11(3), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.7160/ eriesj.2018.110302

Jäder, J., Lithner, J., & Sidenvall, J. (2019). Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656826

Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3

Malatjie, F., & Machaba, F. (2019). Exploring mathematics learners’ conceptual understanding of coordinates and transformation geometry through concept mapping. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/110784

Mueller, M., & Yankelewitz, D. (2014). Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 27–38.

NCTM. (2014). Procedural Fluency in Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Reiss, K., & Törner, G. (2007). Problem solving in the mathematics classroom: The German perspective. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0040-5

Rolka, K., & Liljedahl, P. (2007). The role of cognitive conflict in belief changes. 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Rosyadi, A. A. P., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, & Rahardjo, S. (2022). High order thinking skills: Can it arise when a prospective teacher solves a controversial mathematics problem? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2157(1), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012038

Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. The Arithmetic Teacher.

Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and onceptual knowledge: Exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828

Subanji, Rosyadi, A. A. P., & Emanuel, E. P. L. (2021). Levels of controversial reasoning of the pre-service teachers to solve mathematical problems. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.4.55

Tall, D. (1977). Cognitive conflict and the learning of mathematics. The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Watson, J. M. (2002). Inferential reasoning and the influence of cognitive conflict. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023622017006

Watson, Jane M. (2007). The role of cognitive conflict in developing students’ understanding of average. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9043-3

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Sikky El Walida, Fadhila Kartika Sari, Yuli Ismi Nahdiyati Ilmi, Gusti Firda Khairunnisa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Please find the rights and licenses in Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. By submitting the article/manuscript, the author(s) accept this policy.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

2. Author's Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by a stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika's spirit is to disseminate articles published for free. Under the Creative Commons license, Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika when distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in one's future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for one's purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika).

5. Co-Authorship

If other authors jointly prepared the article, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have authorized them to agree on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agree to inform their co-authors of the terms of this policy. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will not be held liable for anything arising from the author(s) internal dispute. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such an extent that it is legally permissible, the author waives their right to collect royalties relative to the article regarding any use by Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

7. Miscellaneous

Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the editorial process is completed. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika h editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published to be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers, as mentioned in point 3.