VALIDITAS KONSTRUK INSTRUMEN ADAPTASI KUESIONER SUMBER DAYA SEKOLAH

Penulis

  • Husain Abdul Rahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v7i1.2564

Kata Kunci:

CFA, model fit, construct validity

Abstrak

This research aims to test the construct validity of the adapted Resource Management Questionnaire Instrument, which was developed to measure examining resource management in Muhammadiyah private junior high schools in the Makassar City. The researchers used Confirmatory Factor Analysis and several fit indices, including Normed Chi-square, RMSEA, Standardized RMR, NFI, NNFI, and CFI, to evaluate the overall fit of the model. The standardized factor loadings and t-Values were used to provide evidence of the construct validity of the instrument. All of the 30 items in the questionnaire, had factor loadings greater than 0.4 and t-Values greater than 1.96.

Referensi

Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling withLISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Campher T., Preez P.D., Grobler, B., Loock, C., and Shaba S.M. (2003) Managing School Finances (Module 5: Effective Education Management Series). Sandown: Heinemann.

Coleman, M., Thurlow, M., Bush, T., & Thurlow, M. (Eds.). (2003). Leadership and strategic management in South African schools. Commonwealth Secretariat.

Cronbach, L.J. and Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281

Foskett, N., and Lumby, J. (2003) Leading and Managing Education. London: Paul Chapman.

Ghozali, I. and Fuad, (2014). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 9.10, 4th Edition. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Guilford, J.P., (1946). New standards for test evaluation. Educational and psychological measurement, 6(4), 427-438.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E., 2010.Multivariate data analysis, 7th edition. New Jersey: Person Prentice Hall.

Hendryadi, and Suryani, (2014). Structural equation modeling dengan LISREL 8.80: Pedoman untuk pemula. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Jöreskog, K.G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202.

Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 3rd Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Mestry, R. and Bisschoff T.C. (2009) Financial School Management Explained 3rd edition. Cape Town: Pearson Education South Africa.

Mestry, R. and Bodalina, K. (2015). The perceptions and experiences of school management teams and teachers of the management of physical resources in public schools. Educational management administration & leadership, 43(3), pp.433-451

Moloi K.C. (2002). The School as a Learning Organization: Reconceptualizing School Practices in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Van der Westhuizen, P.C. (2013). Schools as organisations . Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Yuniarti, N. and Soenarto, S. (2016). Validitas konstrak instrument evaluasi outcome lembaga pendidikan guru vokasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20 (2), 221 -233

Diterbitkan

2023-03-31

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Citation Check