ANALISIS KESALAHAN PADA SISWA KELAS XI DALAM MENGERJAKAN SOAL MATERI MATRIKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v4i1.513Kata Kunci:
analisis kesalahan, matematika, materi matriksAbstrak
Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bagaimana kesalahan pada siswa kelas XI dalam mengerjakan soal materi matriks. Penelitian yang termasuk kedalam penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek dalam penelitian adalah  siswa kelas XI MAN di Cimahi yang berjumlah 9 orang. Instrument tes yang diberikan yaitu lima butir soal. Teknik pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini adalah tes. Data yang diperoleh adalah kesalahan yang siswa lakukan dalam menjawab setiap butir soal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bawah siswa yang menjawab benar pada soal nomor satu sebesar100%, soal nomor dua sebesar 66,7%, soal nomor tiga sebesar 10%, soal nomor empat sebesar 100%, dan soal nomor lima sebesar 77,8%. Hasil presentase siswa yang menjawab benar menunjukan bahwa masih banyak kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa. Kesalahan tersebut berada pada soal nomor dua, tiga dan lima. Karena bisa dilihat dari presentase ketiga nomor tersebut memiliki presentase cukup rendah, berbeda dengan soal nomor satu dan empat yang memiliki presentase sangat baik. Kesalahan yang ditemukan pada ketiga nomor  diantaranya : 1) kesalahan konsep perkalian matriks, 2) kesalahan dalam perhitungan, 3) kesalahan tidak menuliskan tanda operasi, 4) kesalahan konsep, dan 5) kesalahan kecerobohan. Kesalahan ini disebabkan siswa lupa materi, kecorobohan, kurang memperhatikan informasi yang dari soal dan tidak telitinya siswa dalam mengerjakan soal.
ABSTRACT
The goal of this research is to describe how wrong all of the students in the sophomores have been in solving matrix material. The method of this research is qualitative descriptive research. The subject in this research is XI grade of MAN CIMAHIÂ is 9 person. The instrument of the test was given the five grains of matter. The data-collection of this technique is a test. The data was obtained is a student's fault in answering every questions. Based on the results was obtained by the undergraduates who get the right answers on the number is one problem is 100%, the problem of number two is 66.7%, the problem of number three is 10%, the problem of number four is 100%, and the problem of number five at 77.8%. The results of this research is student do the presentation that gave the correct answer show there are many mistakes of the students. The fault shows in problem number two, three and five. Because it evidenced in the third percentage that the number has a fairly low percentage, in contrast to the number one and four that have a very good presentation. The Errors found in all three numbers such as : 1) matrix multiplication errors, 2) errors in calculation, 3) errors did not mark operations, 4) draft errors, and 5) discretionary errors. The mistake was caused by students forgetting the material, demolition, lacking interest and not studying in their problem of students.
Referensi
Abdurrahman, M. (2003). Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Alimuddin. (2009). Menumbuh Kembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Tugas- Tugas Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian , Pendidikan Dan Penerapan MIPA, Yogyakarta, UNY.
Aripin, U., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Alternative Solutions Worksheet untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ.Muhammadiyah Metro, 6(2), 225–233.
Badaruddin, Kadir, & Anggo, M. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal–Soal Operasi Hitung Pecahan pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 10 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 43–56.
Chotimah, S. (2015). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Educations pada Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 9, 26–32.
Chotimah, S., Ramdhani, F. A., Bernard, M., & Akbar, P. (2018). Pengaruh Pendekatan Model-Eliciting Activities Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematik Siswa. Journal On Education, 01(02), 68–77.
Farkhan, N. N., & Firmansyah, D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Matriks. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(4), 971–979.
Fausan, Sagita, G., & Sukayasa. (2019). Profil Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matriks Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin di SMA Negeri 7 Palu. AKSIOMA, 08(02).
Imelda, M., Yusmin, E., & Suratman, D. (2014). Profil kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi hitung campuran bilangan bulat di smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 3(2), 1–13.
Komalasari, L. I. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dan Guru SMK dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Histogram, 3(2), 189–198.
Ramlah, Bennu, S., & Paloloang, B. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Pecahan di Kelas VII SMPN Model Terpadu Madani. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 182–194.
Rangkuti, A. R. (2013). Representasi Matematis. Logaritma, I(02), 49–61.
Ruseffendi, E. T. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non-Eksakta Lainnya.Bandung. (Tarsito, Ed.). Bandung.
Setiawan, W. (2015). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Model Penemuan Terbimbing. Jurnal Ilmiah UPT P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(1).
Tasman, F., Yenti, I. N., & Heriyanti, S. (2016). Analisis kesalahan transformasi soal pada kemampuan representasi matematis secara simbolik. EKSAKTA, 2, 24–30.
Utami, W. . (2012). Identitas Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Persoalan Matematika yang Berkaitan dengan Pecahan di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Ngaglik Sleman Tahun Ajaran2011/2012. E-Jurnal Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, [Online](Tersedia:http// journal.student.uny.ac.id/jurnal/artikel/471/43/180 [19 Januari 2020]).
Wahbi, A., & Anwar, B. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Faktorisasi Suku Aljabar Ditinjau dari Objek Matematika pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 15 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1).
Wulandari, T., & Resta, E. L. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pada materi lingkaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2, 1693–1697.
Zanthy, L. S. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar ditinjau dari Latar Belakang Pilihan Jurusan Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa di STKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Jurnal Teori Dan Riset Matematika (TEOREMA) Vol., 1(1).
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Citation Check
Lisensi
Please find the rights and licenses in Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. By submitting the article/manuscript, the author(s) accept this policy.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by a stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika's spirit is to disseminate articles published for free. Under the Creative Commons license, Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika when distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in one's future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for one's purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika).
5. Co-Authorship
If other authors jointly prepared the article, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have authorized them to agree on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agree to inform their co-authors of the terms of this policy. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will not be held liable for anything arising from the author(s) internal dispute. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such an extent that it is legally permissible, the author waives their right to collect royalties relative to the article regarding any use by Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
7. Miscellaneous
Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the editorial process is completed. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika h editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published to be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers, as mentioned in point 3.